> будут втирать байки про то как хорош ODF?
> может быть от того хорош, что им никто не пользуется(sic!) То ли дело OOXML, который раз эдак в 10 жирней и который MC сам не осилил? )
https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/community/osor/case/complex-sing...
> OOXML’s original author, Microsoft, promises that its Office software fully supports OOXML as the ‘most-used document standard’.
...
> Vignoli shows how in five steps, all common spreadsheet operations, even Microsoft’s most recent Office
> version, Office 2013, does not properly support Open XML Strict,
> the declared document standard for all the vendor’s products.
...
> Vajna has shown that Office itself interprets the same file differently: where Office 2010 shows a green
> triangle, Office 2007 has a red one. And this is just one example.
> Microsoft’s own lack of consistency gave the LibreOffice developers a problem. As in so many other cases,
> again they had to resort to reverse engineering, yet at the end of the day they still
> had to choose whether to be compatible with the 2007 or the 2010 version of Office.
...
> he explains the reverse-engineering work that open source developers have to do simply because the
> standard is not as open as it should be, and because different Microsoft products interpret
> it in different ways.
...
> By establishing its Markup Compatibility and Extensibility (MCE) technology in ISO 29500 Microsoft has
> gained the right to make changes to the document format simply by adding their own extensions, almost
> without limits. That makes it hard for any other company or open source project to be fully compatible.
Но зато да, можно с честным и даже немного грустным выражением лица заявлять, что опсос софт, к сожалению, не умеет в открытые форматы обмена документами.
